Can A New Relisting Maxis Be Like An Old Delisted Maxis....Tomorrow (19 Nov 2009) Is The Day...

After disappear from Bursa for an about nearly 2 years, Maxis is comeback again. Many investors are eager to possess at least a lot of Maxis share in their portfolios. What are people saying about this on the market? Here is a comment. Many fund and individual are also showing great interest on it as per this report. While one of a research house has pegged a fair value of RM for Maxis . Before this many disappointed about the allocation of the Maxis IPO as reported here. One is saying that the existing rival is worth to buy. So tomorrow (19 Nov 2009) will answer it. Check the Best Buy/Sell column on the Bursa Malaysia from 8.30am till trading start at 9.00am.They will reflect the opening price of Maxis Berhad and The Stock Short Name, Stock Code and ISIN Code of MAXIS is "MAXIS", "6012" and "MYL6012OO008" respectively. The listing of and quotation for these shares on the Main Market under the "Trading Services" sector will be granted with effect from 9.00 a.m., Thursday, 19 November 2009, on a "Ready" basis pursuant to the Rules of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad. So Good Luck to those succesfully subscribe the Maxis IPO recently.

Dismay over small share allocation

PETALING JAYA: Maxis Bhd’s huge shares offering was lapped up by investors hungry for quality local stock, but some investment funds and their clients were dismayed by the “small” portion of initial public offering (IPO) shares allocated to them.
Industry sources said some local funds received less than 5% of the amount they had bid for, despite many putting in bids at strike prices (meaning that they were willing to take the shares at any given price) or at the top end of the indicative price range.
Maxis on Tuesday said the institutional offering – excluding shares reserved for cornerstone investors and bumiputera investors approved by the International Trade and Industries Ministry (Miti) – was 3.7 times oversubscribed.

That translated to a demand worth RM19.3bil from local and foreign fund managers for shares valued at RM5.3bil offered by Maxis at RM5 each. The 1.06 billion shares allocated under the institutional portion was distributed almost in equal part between local and foreign fund managers.
Meanwhile, the retail portion of 212.3 million IPO shares was oversubscribed by 1.8 times.
In total, Maxis attracted bids worth RM26.5bil for its IPO of 2.25 billion shares.
Maxis’ share sale raised RM11.2bil, which makes it the biggest IPO in South-East Asia to date.
James Lau, senior director-equities of Kenanga Investment Bank Bhd, shares his clients’ disappointment at receiving only a small allocation of Maxis stock.
“Even though the small allocation to funds bodes well for the post-listing market of Maxis shares, we had hoped for more shares,” he said, adding that in the bigger picture, with Maxis shares being offered as an “entree” to attract first-time foreign investors here, the small allocation to local funds may be a justified trade-off.
Lau said, however, that he hoped for more transparency in the allocation process “so that investors can better understand the situation and don’t feel overly disappointed by the small allocation.”
Maxis said the book-building exercise attracted “significant” foreign interest, including from 10 new institutional funds, as well as sovereign wealth funds.
“They (the promoters) could have done more roadshows to explain the whole deal to a wider group of investors,” said Rusli Abu Yamin, chief investment officer (CIO) at ASM Investment Services.
“That would have reduced a lot of confusion on how the IPO was structured and priced,” he added.
ASM Investment Services is a wholly-owned unit of Amanah Saham Mara Bhd, which gets its portion of Maxis shares via reserved units for Miti-approved bumiputra investors.
ASM put in a bid of RM5.50, but as the final price was reduced to RM5 a piece for institutional investors, the difference would be refunded to ASM within 10 days.
Rusli said the excess fund could be parked in money markets, and the issuing house should consider sharing part of the interest earned during that 10-day period with investors.
“Some funds get less than what they had applied for and given the size of the bids, the amount could be substantial,” he said.
OSK-UOB Investment Unit Trust Management Bhd CIO Jason Chong said he was “happy” with the amount of Maxis shares allocated to the fund.
“The IPO was priced at the lower end, which is good for us as this translates to higher upside potential,” he said.

xtracted from : The Star By RISEN JAYASEELAN and IZWAN IDRIS

How to detect some early financial warnings in companies Or how to smell a rat

TRADING volume on the stock market has recently been getting higher again. Some retail investors, who were absent from the recent rally, have started to get excited.

Over the past few months, investors were mainly focusing on good quality stocks, selling at a cheap level. However, attention has started to switch to poor quality stocks lately. Even though sometimes investors may be able to make money by betting on those stocks, we still need to be careful about the fundamentals of the companies. In this article, we will look at how to detect some early financial warnings.

A lot of companies like to make corporate announcements during the bull market. We agree that some of the announcements were genuine, but many corporate proposals were simply too good to be true.

If we analyse further, we will notice that the proposals might be way beyond the capabilities of the companies. Sometimes, the management’s projections of sales and profits were far beyond the past history. The capital expenditure requirements were well above the companies’ borrowing capacities.

Besides, the time required to turn the projects into profits might be too long. Nevertheless, as a result of the announcements, the stock prices would surge and normally, the main sellers behind might be the key owners.

We have also seen some proposals that turned out to be profitable. The companies did make profits in the first few years. However, the high growth in expansion stretched the capabilities of the top management, who might not have the experience and ability to run big businesses. They might have the experience to manage RM100mil turnover businesses. However, when the turnover surged beyond RM1bil per year, they might have problems. In fact, the main concerns to the companies were the top management team which lacked skills and experience to run big businesses.

We need to be careful if there are any changes to the key managers of the companies, auditors or accounting firms. The key managers are referred to the positions like chief executive officers and financial controllers. Besides, frequent changes in auditors provide serious financial warnings, especially the change from a reputable audit firm to an unknown one.

How to smell a rat or how to detect some early financial warnings in companies

Companies will soon start to report their financial results for the period ended Sept 30. In Malaysia, often good companies will try to announce their results before the deadline of Nov 30. However, if they are having difficulties in providing their financial statements, normally, we will expect some bad news to be announced. One of the possible explanations behind the delay is that the companies need more time to rectify certain financial problems.

Another potential sign of financial warning is when the companies venture into unrelated businesses. Previously, we saw many Bursa Malaysia second board companies going into financial distress in 1997/98 when they departed from their core businesses in manufacturing and ventured into property development activities.

We need to understand that when the company owners enter into areas that are not their core competencies, they might not be able to apply the knowledge and experiences accumulated previously. Instead, they would have to go through the entire learning curve again, which would result in the management taking a lot of time in managing those unrelated businesses.

In such situations, investors will need to pay attention and analyse whether those new ventures will be able to add value to the shareholders’ wealth. Some companies like to change their names after venturing into new businesses. Too frequent name changes may also imply that the companies have been shifting their core business focus and directions, which may not be good news to the shareholders.

Litigation is also another warning sign. We need to pay attention to companies that are involved in litigations, which may be either attributed to the companies being sued or they are suing someone else. These litigations may divert the management’s attention from day-to-day business operations. As a result, they may affect the companies’ performance as well.

One of the common questions asked by shareholders during any AGM is the directors’ fees. We need to analyse whether the fees paid are in proportion to the companies’ profitability. Sometimes, certain companies make excessive perks for owners as well as their employees or the lifestyle of the key owners is simply not consistent with the companies’ profitability.

The above are a few of the more common financial warnings that potential or existing shareholders must pay attention to when analysing the companies for investment. More importantly, we need to remain vigilant at all times and pay attention to the latest development of the companies.

by Ooi Kok Wah

Should I go against the market?

AS the stock market continues to move higher, a lot of investors are wondering when it will come down again. Those who have been involved in futures trading may be tempted to short the KL Composite Index (KLCI) futures contracts.
Unfortunately, each time they start shorting the index, the market surges even higher and touches a new high. As a result, they are forced to cover their short positions as the market turns against them. In this article, we will look at how to apply contrarian strategies in the present market conditions.
Contrarian strategy 1: only correct when the market turns around
Investors need to be careful when using contrarian strategies. These strategies are only effective when the market starts to turn around, otherwise, investors will end up being wrong.
Contrarian investors feel that most people in the market tend to get carried away by the market sentiment, so if they keep calm, they will have a better position by taking actions that are the opposite of what others are doing. They believe that they can make big money by betting against popular investment trends.
In the current stock market situation, even though the average daily-trading volume is about one billion shares, we notice that there are not many retail investors. The market is mainly filled with some big fund managers or day traders. Some investors who managed to catch stocks at cheaper prices may have been selling most of their holdings lately.
Unfortunately, the market continues to trade higher than previous selling prices. In such situation, the worst mistake for some retail investors is to abandon their contrarian strategies and start buying back the shares that they disposed off earlier at even higher prices.
Normally, when everyone starts to think that the stock market will continue to go up, that is the signal of an impending market crash. Hence, investors need to be patient to wait for the right prices before buying back those stocks.
There is also the danger that some investors may start accumulating their stocks too early. We believe that “the panic may be over, but not the crisis”. Even though there are signs that the overall economy may be on its way to recovery, we think it will take some time before we can see the real recovery of the stock market.

We need to understand that once the fund managers feel that the stock prices are far above the fundamental of the stocks, they may stop accumulating stocks.
As a result, due to a lack of demand, the market may start dipping lower again with dwindling trading volumes. It may take a long time before the market turns higher again.
We saw this phenomenon in 2000-2001 when the market dipped slowly with very thin volume for a 15-month period, with the KLCI tumbling from about 1,000-level in February 2000 to 550-level in May 2001, a total decline of about 45%.
Investors need to take note that unless they have deep pockets to average down their purchase prices over a long period, they may run out of funds before the market reaches the bottom.
One way to avoid accumulating stocks too early is by adopting the filter rule strategy proposed by Alexander (1961). He proposed that we should only buy stocks when the market touches the lowest point and starts recovering for k% from its low and sell stocks when the market discovers the peak and starts falling for k% from its high.
This strategy may reduce the feeling of regret from selling stocks too early. Given that we may never know when the market touches its peak, it may be a good strategy to let the market find the top and only start selling when the market confirms the declining trends.
Contrarian Strategy 2: Buying neglected firms
Recently, as the result of the merger between main and second board companies into the Main Market, we notice that some second board companies, which have good fundamentals but previously lacked analysts’ coverage, are starting to get the attention of investors.
We believe these companies may provide good buying opportunities for investors who have missed out on the opportunities of accumulating blue chip stocks at cheap prices. Some academic studies have shown that the returns from buying neglected firms, over a long-term period, may be better than investing in “popular” companies.

xtracted from :The Star (Ooi Kok Hwa)

As an investor can I rely on technical analysis?

Investors need proper training as this area requires a lot of subjective judgement and experiences.
ALL the famous investment gurus in the world, like Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett, say that we should not try to time the stock market because we will not be able to predict its movement.
However, professional technical analysts believe that investors are able to time the market by looking into the historical price trends and trading volumes. They believe that the weakness in fundamental analysis is it is unable to provide the timing to buy or sell stocks.
Fundamental analysts are able to detect good quality stocks for long-term investments. However, they do not know when to accumulate or to dispose the stocks.
Technical analysts believe that a lot of good fundamental factors for certain stocks may have already been reflected in the stock prices. As a result, any investor who would like to purchase the stocks may not be able to make gains as the stock prices have already included the good fundamental factors.
Nevertheless, if investors know technical analysis, they may be able to discover the stocks much earlier than the others. A lot of time, these fundamental factors may not be made known to the public.
However, some investors, who are aware of these fundamental factors, may start accumulating the stocks. Technical analysts believe that these early actions can be detected by looking into charts.
Technical analysis is based on the interaction between the supply and demand for the stocks, which can be caused by the rational and irrational factors.
Technical analysts believe that prices move in trend and can persist for a long time until something happens to the stocks.
Even though technical analysts do not know all the factors that influence the buying or selling of all stocks, they believe that investors are able to know the actual shifts in the supply and demand of stocks by looking into their market price behaviour.
One of the advantages of technical analysis is that it is simple to use. Compared with the fundamental analysis, investors do not need to read financial statements before using technical analysis. Nevertheless, investors are still required to have adequate knowledge on how to interpret various types of charts.
Given that there are many types of charts, investors may get confused as some charts may indicate buying signals while others may indicate selling signals.
Sometimes, when there are too many investors using different types of charts, the effects may be neutralised between each other.
For market efficiency believers, they postulate that it is not possible make any gains by merely looking into stock prices and volumes because they believe that the stock market may have reflected all these factors. They label this phenomenon as weak-form of market efficiency.
In most academic researches on testing weak-form stock market efficiency (testing the market based on stock prices and volumes), they discovered that investors cannot consistently outperform the market.
Fundamental analysts believe that by merely looking into technical charts alone may sometimes cause investors buying into poor fundamental stocks.
However, technical analysts argue that these negative factors can also be detected using charts because poor fundamental stocks will normally face heavy selling by investors.
The technical charts will indicate when the stocks start facing selling pressures and investors need to sell the stocks once the charts indicate the selling signals.
Some investors believe that there may be self-fulfilling prophecy on technical analysis.
When many people are using the same technical chart on one company and the chart shows a buy on the stock, many investors will follow to buy the stocks. These may cause the stock prices to go up and reinforce the idea that the technical rules work.
We believe that investors need to know both fundamentals as well as technical analysis as these two methods can complement each other. Both methods have their strengths and weaknesses.
Sometimes we may want to use fundamentals to identify the stocks for purchase, then, use technical analysis to gauge when to buy the stocks; or we can use technical analysis to select stocks and use fundamentals to confirm the quality of the companies.
In conclusion, as technical analysis requires a lot of subjective judgement and experiences, we believe that investors need to have a proper training in this area. Interested investors are encouraged to read books related to this area to have better understanding.

We need to know who we are in order to do well in stock market investing

THE recent strong market rally caught many investors by surprise again.
Most investors, including some analysts, predicted earlier that it was just a bear market rally. They have been hoping the market will turn down again. Unfortunately, it has been moving up strong without looking back.
For investors who have not invested during the recent low in March 2009, they are getting very worried as they are not benefitting from the recent rally. They may even wonder whether they should jump in now in order not to miss the boat.
Another group of investors, who have managed to catch some stocks at cheap prices during the previous market low, are also facing the dilemma of whether to lock in their gains now or continue to hold on to their gains. Some even regretted selling their stocks too early last month.
We all know that it is very difficult, in fact impossible, to predict stock market movement. Most investment gurus will refuse to time the market.
Howard Kahn and Cary Cooper published a book titled “Stress in the Dealing Room” in 1993. According to their surveys done on 225 dealers, 73.8% of them suffered from fear of “misreading the market.” Most dealers have the same problem of acquiring and handling information.
We believe that in order to do well in stock investing, we need to know ourselves, especially in controlling our emotion on greed and fear.
Due to information overloading, our emotion is highly influenced by the news that we read. Each time we feel that the market is getting bullish and time to buy stock, the overall market will collapse the moment we enter.
On the other hand, the moment we fear that it will drop further and we have decided to cut losses, we will notice the market will recover after that. Most of the time, the prices of stocks that we sold were at the lowest of the recent fall.
In order to control our greed and fear, we need to ask ourselves whether the market has discounted the news that we have received.
For example, many analysts have been bullish lately, having the opinion that the worst may be over for the market based on the recent economic indicators which showed that the overall economy may have stopped contracting or is on its way to recovery.
Nevertheless, the recent strong market rally would have discounted this bullish news. In fact, we need to ask ourselves whether the current stock prices can be supported by the fundamentals for certain listed companies.
In our experience, in most cases, the moment we feel like buying stocks is the best time to sell them while the moment that we feel like selling them is in fact the best time to buy. We can apply this contrarian theory quite successfully in most periods.
Sometimes, if we are taking in too much contradicting information and, as a result, get confused over the market direction, we feel that the best strategy is to stay away from the market until we have a better and clearer picture of the overall market or the economic situation.
We should not be influenced by other opinions.
There are times that we need to follow our heart. Sometimes, our hearts try to warn us from taking hasty investment decisions. However, we refuse to follow our intuition but instead, choosing to get influenced by others or the information that we read and ending up making mistakes.
In conclusion, we need to maintain our concentration.
We should not be led by the market sentiments regardless whether it is on the way up or crashing down fast. We need to go back to the fundamental of economic situation and the companies’ performance and future prospects.
One way to minimise the feeling of regret is to stagger our purchase and selling. We will only know the peak when the market starts turning downwards and vice versa. Therefore, by staggering, we will have an averaging effect rather than taking a one-time hit, especially if it is at the wrong timing.

America will overcome Country’s best days lie ahead, says Buffett --- Boleh Percaya Kah Ni?

Malas dah nak copy tp sesiapa yg interested nak baca just click here

How long should investors hold their stock investments?

here is some tips by the expertise just click here

Pastikan dahulu kesahihan status halal di kopitiam

KOPITIAM atau kedai kopi yang menyediakan roti bakar berserta nasi lemak dan kuih-muih semakin popular di kalangan sesetengah penduduk Islam negara ini. Perniagaan yang dipelopori oleh masyarakat Cina ini dikatakan wujud di Tanah Melayu sejak 1938 lagi. Sehingga kini pelbagai jenama kopitiam muncul bagaikan cendawan tumbuh selepas hujan, berikutan permintaan menggalakkan.
Sebagai individu Muslim, persoalan yang perlu diteliti sebelum sesuatu makanan atau minuman dimasukkan ke mulut ialah adalah ia halal di sisi syariat?
Kelihatannya dewasa ini tidak ramai yang mengambil berat persoalan itu. Mungkin yang penting bagi mereka ialah apa yang dimakan menepati selera dan mengenyangkan perut.
Namun jika ditinjau kaitan makanan dengan syariat, isunya bukan sekadar makanan dan minuman yang menyelerakan tetapi ia boleh menjadi penyebab seseorang dihumban ke neraka. Rasullulah SAW pernah bersabda yang bermaksud: Setiap daging yang tumbuh daripada yang haram maka neraka adalah tempat yang layak baginya.
Lebih daripada itu umat Islam diseru agar sentiasa memelihara diri dan keluarga daripada terjerumus ke dalam neraka. Sebagai mana firman Allah SWT yang bermaksud: "Wahai orang yang beriman! Peliharalah diri kamu dan keluarga kamu daripada neraka yang bahan-bahan bakarnya ialah manusia dan batu (berhala);
Neraka itu dijaga dan dikawal oleh malaikat-malaikat yang keras kasar (layanannya); mereka tidak menderhaka kepada Allah dalam segala yang diperintahkan-Nya kepada mereka, dan mereka pula tetap melakukan segala yang diperintahkan. (Surah al-Tahrim ; ayat 6)
Tindakan sesetengah pengusaha kopitiam menggaji pekerja Islam di premis mereka, adalah suatu usaha yang patut dipuji tetapi ia belum menjamin aspek halal yang dituntut dalam Islam. Mereka seharusnya lebih prihatin dengan keperluan umat Islam untuk mendapatkan makanan halal lagi suci.
Bermula daripada kopi yang disajikan sehinggalah kepada aspek kebersihan pinggan mangkuk perlu selari dengan kehendak syariat. Begitu juga barangan seperti mee, daging salai, rempah-ratus dan lain-lain yang diimport daripada negara luar seperti Taiwan, Hong Kong dan China yang turut diragui sama ada halal ataupun tidak.
Lebih membimbangkan lagi apabila logo 'Halal' Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (Jakim) tiruan digunakan dengan meluas semata-mata untuk melariskan barangan dan mengelabui mata pengguna Islam yang tidak prihatin.
Pengusaha kopitiam seharusnya mendapatkan pengiktirafan sijil halal daripada Jakim mahupun Majlis Agama Islam Negeri, sebagai usaha menarik lebih ramai pelanggan Islam ke premis mereka. Langkah ini perlu dipertimbangkan dengan serius memandangkan di sesetengah kopitiam, 70 peratus pengunjung adalah penganut Islam.
Orang Islam pula perlu lebih sensitif terhadap isu halal kerana ia boleh memberi kesan kepada peribadi dan keimanan seseorang.
Kajian oleh majalah The Halal Journal berkaitan kesedaran masyarakat Islam terhadap produk halal di beberapa negara Eropah, Asia Barat dan Asia Tenggara yang berakhir pada 2007 menunjukkan, 94 hingga 98 peratus responden bersetuju untuk membeli hanya produk berasaskan daging yang halal.
Sementara itu, hanya 40 hingga 64 peratus responden bersetuju makanan yang telah siap diproses seperti roti dan lain-lain mestilah berstatus halal.
Statistik ini jelas menunjukkan, kesedaran umat Islam terhadap produk makanan halal yang telah diproses masih ditahap sederhana. Sehubungan itu, pihak yang bertanggungjawab seperti Jakim dan Persatuan Pengguna Islam Malaysia melipatgandakan lagi usaha mempromosi produk halal kepada seluruh masyarakat Islam agar kewajipan umat Islam mendapatkan makanan yang halal dapat dipenuhi.
Selain itu, ia juga berupaya membangkitkan sensitiviti umat Islam untuk lebih prihatin mencari yang halal sahaja.
Pihak berwajib juga diharap dapat memperbanyakkan lagi aktiviti penguatkuasaan ke atas logo halal agar pihak yang tidak bertanggungjawab dibawa ke pengadilan.
Kita tidak mahu ada pihak yang mengambil kesempatan meraih keuntungan lumayan daripada trend lepak di kopitiam tanpa mengambil kira sensitiviti masyarakat Islam.

Oleh MOHD. ALI MUHAMAD DON
Pensyarah Kanan
Pusat Pemikiran dan Kefahaman Islam
UiTM Kampus Bandaraya, Johor Bahru.

Off Topic - Siapa Yahudi? Siapa Orang Islam?

SEJAK 18 hari ini seluruh dunia meratap gara-gara kezaliman Israel. Tentera Zionis terus-menerus mengebom, mengganyang rakyat Palestin. Israel, nampaknya terlalu berkuasa.
Saya tidak 'berkuasa' lagi untuk mengulas panjang mengenai peperangan sebelah pihak itu. Tapi saya ingin berkongsi dengan pembaca sekelian, siapa sebenarnya Yahudi ini dan mengapa mereka terlalu berkuasa.

Kita harus kaji secara akademik, ilmiah untuk mengetahui siapa mereka ini.
Saya amat tertarik dengan tulisan seorang penulis bebas, yang juga Pengarah Eksekutif Pusat Penyelidikan dan Kajian Keselamatan (CRSS) Pakistan, Dr. Farrukh Saleem (rujuk http://www.masada2000.org/Powerful-Jews.html) mengenai soal tersebut. Jadikanlah tulisan itu sebagai tatapan dan renungan kita semua - ke mana kita dan ke mana umat Islam harus pergi selepas ini. Dan, siapa yang harus disalahkan? (Nota: Sedikit sebanyak ia juga akan menjawab surat-surat dan SMS yang dihantar untuk ruangan Forum, Utusan Malaysia yang meminta ditonjolkan apakah produk di belakangnya Yahudi).

Begini tulisan beliau:
Hanya ada 14 juta Yahudi di muka bumi ini; tujuh juta di Amerika, lima juta di Asia, dua juta di Eropah dan 100,000 di Afrika. Bagi setiap orang Yahudi ada 100 orang Muslim (1:100). Namun, jika dicampur semua sekali, Yahudi lebih 100 kali berkuasa daripada orang Islam. Mengapa ini berlaku?

Siapa mereka ini?
Nabi Isa (Jesus of Nazareth) ialah Yahudi. Albert Einstein, saintis zaman moden paling terkemuka dan disebut oleh majalah Time sebagai 'Manusia Abad ini' ialah seorang Yahudi; Sigmund Freud - melalui teori id, ego dan super-ego ialah bapa psikoanalisis, juga seorang Yahudi; begitu juga Karl Marx, Paul Samuelson dan Milton Friedman.
Selain mereka banyak lagi orang Yahudi yang hasil kebijaksanaan mereka berupaya menghasilkan keperluan untuk kita semua: Benjamin Rubin memperkenalkan jarum suntikan pelalian.
Johas Salk mereka vaksin polio yang pertama. Gertrude Elion mencipta ubat melawan leukemia. Baruch Blumberg mencipta vaksin Hepatitis B. Paul Ehrlich menemukan rawatan untuk siflis. Elie Metchnikoff menang Hadiah Nobel untuk penyakit berjangkit. Bernard Katz menang Hadiah Nobel kerana kajian mengenai transmisi neuromuskular.
Andrew Schally penerima Nobel dalam kajian endokrinologi (berkaitan sistem endokrin dan kencing manis). Aaron Beck menemui terapi kognitif (rawatan mental, kesugulan dan fobia).
Gregory Pincus membangunkan pil perancang keluarga yang pertama. George Wald menang Nobel bagi kajian mata manusia, Standley Cohen dianugerahi Hadiah Nobel dalam kajian embriologi (kajian janin dan perkembangannya). Willem Kolff mencipta mesin dialisis (mencuci) buah pinggang.
Sejak 105 tahun, 14 juta Yahudi menang 15 dozen Hadiah Nobel, sementara tiga dimenangi oleh 1.4 bilion umat Islam.
Stanley Mezor mencipta mikrocip pertama. Leo Szilards membangunkan reaktor rangkaian nuklear pertama; Peter Schultz (kabel gentian optik); Charles Adler (lampu isyarat); Benno Strauss (besi tahan karat - stainless steel); Isador Kisee (sistem suara di pawagam); Emile Berliner (mikrofon untuk telefon) dan Charles Ginsburg (alat pita rakaman).
Saudagar jenama terkaya dunia juga dikuasai Yahudi iaitu Ralph Lauren (Polo), Levis Strauss (Levi's Jeans), Howard Schultz (Starbuck's), Sergey Brin (Google), Michael Dell (Dell Computers), Larry Ellison (Oracle), Donna Karan (DKNY), Irv Robbins (Baskin & Robbins) dan Bill Rossenberg (Dunkin Donuts).
Richard Levin, presiden universiti tersohor Yale Universiti ialah seorang Yahudi. Henry Kissinger, Joseph Lieberman dan Madeleine Albright (bekas-bekas Setiausaha Negara AS); Alan Greenspan (bekas pengerusi Rizab Persekutuan AS di bawah Reagan, Bush, Clinton dan Bush); Maxim Litvinov (bekas Menteri Luar Soviet Union); David Marshal (bekas Ketua Menteri pertama Singapura); Isaac Isaacs (bekas Gabenor Jeneral Australia); Benjamin Disraeli (negarawan dan penulis Britian); Yevgeny Primkov (bekas Perdana Menteri Rusia dan bekas jeneral KGB); Jorge Sampaio (bekas Presiden Portugal); Herb Gray (bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri Kanada); Pierre Mendes (Perdana Menteri ke-143 Perancis); Michael Howard (bekas Setiausaha Negara British); Bruno Kreisky (bekas Canselor Austria) dan Robert Rubin (bekas Setiausaha Perbendaharaan AS).
Dalam dunia media, orang Yahudi yang terkemuka ialah Wolf Blitzer (CNN); Barbara Walters (ABC News); Eugene Meyer (Washington Post); Henry Grunwald (Ketua Editor Time); Katherine Graham (penerbit The Washington Post); Joseph Lelyyeld (Editor Eksekutif, The New York Times) dan Max Frankel (The New York Times).
Dermawan dan penyangak mata wang, George Soros ialah Yahudi. Dia menderma AS$4 bilion untuk membantu ahli sains dan universiti serata dunia.
Walter Annenberg menderma untuk membina ratusan perpustakaan berjumlah AS$2 bilion.
Di Olimpik, Mark Spitz membolot tujuh pingat emas. Lenny Krayzelburg ialah pemegang tiga kali pingat emas Olimpik. Spitz Krayzelburg dan Boris Becker adalah Yahudi.
Tahukah anda bahawa pelakon pujaan Harrison Ford, George Burns, Tony Curtis, Charles Bronson, Sandra Bullock, Billy Cystal, Woody Allen, Paul Newman, Peter Sellers, Dustin Hoffman, Michael Douglas, Ben Kingsley, Kirk Douglas, Willian Shatner, Jerry Lewis dan Peter Falk semuanya Yahudi?
Tambahan lagi, Hollywood sendiri diwujudkan oleh orang Yahudi. Antara pengarah dan penerbit, Steven Spielberg, Mel Brooks, Oliver Stone, Aaron Spelling (Beverly Hills 90210), Neil Simon (The Odd Couple), Andrew Vaina (Rambo 1- 2-3), Michael Man (Starsky and Hutch), Milos Forman (One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest), Douglas Fairbanks (The Thief Of Baghdad) and Ivan Reitman (Ghostbusters) - semuanya adalah Yahudi.
Mempengaruhi
Washington yang merupakan ibu negara Amerika Syarikat, mempunyai satu pertubuhan lobi yang amat berkuasa. Ia dikenali sebagai Jawatankuasa Hal Ehwal Awam Amerika Israel (AIPAC) yang berupaya mempengaruhi Kongres meluluskan resolusi memuji dan 'membuat apa saja' demi Israel.
Tahukah lagi bahawa William James Sidis dengan IQ 250-300 ialah manusia tercerdik. Dia ialah Yahudi.
Jadi, mengapa mereka ini terlalu berkuasa?
Jawapannya: Pendidikan, pelajaran, ilmu.
Mengapa umat Islam terlalu lemah?
Dianggarkan 1,476,233,470 Muslim di atas muka bumi Allah ini. Satu bilion di Asia, 400 juta di Afrika, 44 juta di Eropah dan enam juta di Amerika. Setiap lima insan manusia ialah Muslim. Setiap seorang Hindu ada dua orang Islam, setiap seorang Buddha ada dua orang Islam dan setiap seorang Yahudi ada beratus orang Islam. Mengapa orang Islam terlalu lemah?
Ini jawapannya: Terdapat 57 negara anggota OIC dan jika dicampur semua cuma ada kira-kira 500 buah universiti; atau sebuah universiti untuk setiap tiga juta orang Islam.
AS mempunyai 5,758 universiti dan India ada 8,407. Pada 2004, Shanghai Jiao Tong Universiti membuat kajian 'Kedudukan Akademik Universiti-universiti Dunia' - dan menakjubkan - tiada satu pun universiti-negara Islam yang berada di puncak 500.
Data yang dikumpul dari UNDP, tahap celik huruf di negara maju ialah hampir 90 peratus dan 15 negara itu mempunyai 100 peratus celik huruf. Negara majoriti penduduk Islam, purata kadar celik huruf ialah sekitar 40 peratus dan tiada negara yang mempunyai 100 peratus semuanya celik huruf.
Sekitar 98 peratus penduduk di negara maju menamatkan sekurang-kurang sekolah rendah, sementara hanya 50 peratus di negara majoriti Islam. Sekitar 40 peratus penduduk di negara maju memasuki universiti, sementara hanya 2 peratus di negara majoriti Islam.
Negara-negara majoriti Islam mempunyai 230 ahli sains bagi setiap (per) sejuta penduduk. Di AS 4,000 per sejuta, Jepun 5,000 per sejuta. Di seluruh negara Arab, penyelidik sepenuh masa ialah 35,000 dan hanya 50 juruteknik per sejuta (berbanding di negara maju 1,000 juruteknik per sejuta).
Negara Islam membelanjakan 0.2 peratus daripada KDNK untuk penyelidikan dan pembangunan (R&D) sebaliknya, di negara maju membelanjakan 5 peratus daripada KDNKnya.
Kesimpulan: Dunia Islam kurang keupayaan untuk menghasilkan ilmu pengetahuan.
Akhbar harian yang dibaca oleh setiap 1,000 orang dan jumlah judul buku yang dibaca oleh setiap sejuta orang adalah dua angka tunjuk bagi menentukan sama ada ilmu pengetahuan disalurkan ke dalam masyarakat.
Di Pakistan, hanya ada 23 akhbar harian per 1,000 rakyat Pakistan sementara nisbah di Singapura ialah 360. Di UK, jumlah judul buku per juta orang ialah 2,000 sementara di Mesir ialah 20.
Kesimpulan: Dunia Islam gagal menyalurkan ilmu pengetahuan.
Yang menariknya, jumlah terkumpul KDNK tahunan 57 buah negara ahli OIC ialah di bawah AS$2 trilion. Amerika sahaja, menghasilkan barangan dan perkhidmatan bernilai AS$12 trilion, China AS$8 trilion, Jepun AS$3.8 trilion dan Jerman AS$2.4 trilion.
Pengeluar minyak yang kaya, Arab Saudi, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar secara rangkuman menghasilkan barangan dan perkhidmatan (rata-rata minyak) bernilai AS$500 bilion; Sepanyol sahaja menghasilkan barangan dan perkhidmatan bernilai lebih AS$1 trilion, Poland AS$489 bilion dan Thailand AS$545 bilion.
Jadi, mengapa orang Islam tidak berkuasa dan orang Yahudi paling berkuasa?
Jawapannya ialah: Kurangnya ilmu. Kurangnya pendidikan dan kurangnya pelajaran.

Maka seruan kepada semua umat Islam ialah KUASAI LAH ILMU...Melalui PENDIDIKAN dan PELAJARAN...